Debug (line 260 of RequestHandler.php): Testing 'element/$ID!' with '' on SilverStripe\Blog\Model\BlogPostController

Debug (line 260 of RequestHandler.php): Testing '$Action//$ID/$OtherID' with '' on SilverStripe\Blog\Model\BlogPostController

Debug (line 267 of RequestHandler.php): Rule '$Action//$ID/$OtherID' matched to action 'handleAction' on SilverStripe\Blog\Model\BlogPostController. Latest request params: array ( 'Action' => NULL, 'ID' => NULL, 'OtherID' => NULL, )

Debug (line 184 of RequestHandler.php): Action not set; using default action method name 'index'

What are age-diagnostic biomarkers? By Paul Farrimond » IGI Ltd.

What are age-diagnostic biomarkers? By Paul Farrimond

Biomarkers (biological marker compounds), in a petroleum geochemical context, are molecules found in oils and source rocks that have a chemical structure that can be unambiguously linked to a known natural product in living organisms. 

They can be considered as “chemical fossils” (Eglinton & Calvin, 1967) left behind by ancient organisms.  The best-known groups of biomarkers are the hopanes and steranes which have long been used in oils to determine the environment of deposition, lithology and maturity of the source rock, and in correlations between different oils and their potential source rocks. 

Significantly, biomarkers also have the potential to provide information about geological age.  This is due to the evolution and extinction of organisms over geological time, and their changing biochemistry; changes that resulted in changes to the biomarkers preserved in the rock record.

Oleanane is an example of an age-diagnostic biomarker associated with the evolution of land plants, specifically the angiosperms (flowering plants).  Although angiosperms originated earlier, they became widespread during the Cretaceous, leaving oleanane (and other related compounds) as chemical fossils in many Cretaceous and younger sedimentary rocks (Moldowan et al., 1994).  The Oleanane Index (oleanane relative to C30 ab hopane; see Figure) is thus a very useful age-diagnostic geochemical parameter to recognise Cretaceous and Tertiary aged samples.

PF July 2022

 

Figure: Three age-diagnostic biomarker parameters driven by: (1) the evolution of land plants (Oleanane Index), (2) the evolution of marine phytoplankton (Norcholestane Ratio) and (3) the Triassic-Jurassic extinction event (Extended Tricyclic Ratio).

The steranes in marine source rocks and oils are mostly derived from phytoplankton, and their composition has changed through geological time due to the evolution of the dominant phytoplankton groups.  One of the most reliable age-diagnostic parameters based on these changes is a ratio of two groups of C26 steranes (norcholestanes; Holba et al., 1998).  The ratio of 24-nor/27-norcholestanes (see Figure; or nordiacholestanes) expressed as an index (Norcholestane Ratio [NCR] and Nordiacholestane Ratio [NDR] respectively) increases progressively in marine-sourced oils through the Jurassic, Cretaceous and Tertiary due to the evolution and diversification of the dinoflagellates, coccolithophores and diatoms.  Higher values of this parameter are typically found in oils with the youngest source rock.

Drastic changes to primary producers of sedimentary organic matter due to Earth’s major extinction events can also cause a change in the biomarker record.  The Triassic-Jurassic extinction event (~200 Ma ago), thought to have resulted from huge volcanic eruptions associated with the rifting of Pangea and the emplacement of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, apparently caused a reduction in the amounts of extended (C28+) tricyclic terpanes in Jurassic oils compared to Triassic-sourced oils (Holba et al., 2001).  The Extended Tricyclic terpane Ratio (ETR; see Figure) is the ratio of C28 + C29 tricyclic terpanes to the rearranged C27 hopane Ts, and generally falls significantly across the Triassic-Jurassic boundary because of the loss of many unidentified organisms that produced the precursors of the extended tricyclic terpanes.

There are other age-diagnostic biomarker parameters than those mentioned here, but almost all can only be used for oils of Triassic age or younger.  C30 sterane isomers can be used to recognize Late Proterozoic to Early Cambrian-sourced oils (McCaffrey et al., 1994), and particularly prominent C17 & C19n-alkanes are associated with some Ordovician oils with abundant Gloeocapsomorpha prisca input, but at the present time there are very few age markers that can be applied in the Paleozoic.  This gap has attracted some research (e.g. Schwark et al., 2006), and continues to do so.

 

References

Eglinton, G. & Calvin, M. (1967). Chemical Fossils. Scientific American216, 32-43.

Holba, A.G., Dzou, L.I.P. & Masterson, W.D. (1998). Application of 24-norcholestanes for constraining source age of petroleum. Organic Geochemistry29, 1269-1283.

Holba, A.G., Ellis, L., Dzou, L.I.P., et al. (2001). Extended tricyclic terpanes as age discriminators between Triassic, Early Jurassic and Middle-Late Jurassic oils. (Abstract) 20th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry, Nancy, France, 10-14 September 2001.

McCaffrey, M., Moldowan, J.M., Lipton, P.A., et al. (1994). Paleoenvironmental implications of novel C30 steranes in Precambrian to Cenozoic age petroleum and bitumen. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta58, 529-532.

Moldowan, J.M., Dahl, J., Huizinga, B.J., et al. (1994). The molecular fossil record of oleanane and its relation to angiosperms. Science265, 768-771.

Schwark, L. & Empt, P. (2006). Sterane biomarkers as indicators of Palaeozoic algal evolution and extinction events. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology240, 225-236.